Matthews and lynne rudder baker the ontological argument in anselms proslogion ii continues to generate a remarkable store of sophisticated commentary and criticism. The second version does not rely on the highly problematic claim that existence is a property and hence avoids many of the objections to the classic version. Neal, anselm s ontological argument for the existence of god from grace incarnate 1990 maciej nowicki, anselm and russell logic and logical philosophy 2006 15. In other words, for the adherents of the ontological argument, the existence of a greatest possible being is necessary, and he is god. Moreover, anselms argument was shown to be a valid argument, with a conclusion that follows from the premises. The philosophical consensus seems to be that the argument is hopeless. Anselm presents a philosophical argument for the existence of god. Compare anselms argument to paleys design argument for gods existence. What is common among these versions of ontological argument, including anselms argument for gods existence, is the claim that it is selfcontradictory to deny the existence of a greatest possible being. If by proving the ontological argument false, i do not prove the conclusion false, just the means of reaching the conclusion. The argument begins with the assertion that god is. More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with an a priori theory about the organization of the universe.
The paper argues that anselms project in the proslogion, is one that anselm himself views as both necessary and paradoxical. Anselms ontological argument manchester university. This is my first essay of my first philosophy course. Saint anselm of canterbury offered several arguments for the existence of god. We examine the famous ontological argument in proslogium ii.
Over the centuries, many philosophers have presented criticisms against anselm s ontological argument, from gaunilo to descartes and locke to lotze. Ontological argument criticisms introduction to philosophy. The simple argument in proslogion 2 was reduced to absurdity by anselms fellow benedictine, gaunilo, in a witty reposte entitled liber pro insipiente or on behalf of the fool. A deductive argument is valid if true premises guarantee a true conclusion. Ontological arguments about the existence of god, based in. He is best known for the celebrated ontological argument for the existence of god in the proslogion, but his contributions to philosophical theology and indeed to philosophy more generally go well beyond the ontological argument. Saint anselm of canterbury 10331109 was the outstanding christian philosopher and theologian of the eleventh century. Pdf anselms ontological argument nicole dunn academia. As clearly as possible, restate anselms ontological argument. Anselm s argument together with gaunilo s, aquinas and kant s objections are conveniently summarized by kenneth einar himma in the internet encyclopedia of philosophy.
Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. Actually anselm s argument belittles the definition of god, since it cannot be derived from his proof whether god is allpowerful, all knowing, and omnipresent or not. Proslogion translated by sidney norton deane preface after i had published, at the solicitous entreaties of certain brethren, a brief work the monologion as an example of meditation on the grounds of faith, in the person of one who investigates, in a course of silent reasoning with himself, matters of which he is ignorant. My aim is to demonstrate that the significance of this. Pdf in this article i offer a new interpretation of saint anselms ontological argument. The ontological argument explained the ontological argument for the existence of a monotheistic god was first put forth by st. About the work although anselms argument for gods existence presented in this article is based on predominately on reason, anselm presents the argument as clari. A contemporary of anselms named gaunilo was an early opponent, who thought the argument would allow us to prove the existence of a perfect. The paper argues that anselm s project in the proslogion, is one that anselm himself views as both necessary and paradoxical. This is an a prioriargument for the existence of god. Several philosophers, including descartes 15961650, followed anselm in putting forth a variation of the argument. This is an a priori argument for the existence of god.
Explain anselms ontological argument essay example. Anselm tried to put forward any proofs of the existence of god. He is best known for the celebrated ontological argument for the existence of god in the proslogion, but his contributions to philosophical theology and indeed to philosophy more generally go well beyond the. Many arguments fall under the category of the ontological, and they tend to involve arguments about the state of being or existing. The one fatal flaw in anselms argument peter millican. The argument for idea will cause logic problem with step 5 and step 6. On the logic of the ontological argument stanford university. Evaluate anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. In this paper i argue, against plantinga and others, that kants claim is indeed relevant to anselms argument, in the straightforward sense that if the claim is true, then anselms argument is unsound.
Explain anselms ontological argument essay graduateway. Anselm sought out to prove gods existence strictly through reason and rationalism alone. For the readers who have not heard this argument, this argument is called an ontological argument, although that label is not anselms it is immanuel kants. Hence, even the fool is convinced that something exists in the understanding, at least, than which nothing greater can be conceived. Anselms argument reconsidered lynne rudder baker and gareth b. Anselms ontological argument alleges that god exists is a statement that, if we are thinking clearly and understand the definition of god, we can know to be true. Anselms ontological argument is certainly one of the most audacious arguments in the history of western philosophy. Anselms name will forever be associated with the ontological argument for gods existence, which holds that the idea of god in ones mind is evidence of a genuinely existing being. Anselm claims that we can prove the existence of god, without any evidence from experience, simply by understanding the conceptof god. I shall devote special atten tion to one particular ontological argument, the most modest. As weve already noted, god is the being than which no greater can be conceived. An ontological argument attempts to establish the existence of god by deductive reason alone without the inference of any empirical evidence.
One might argue that gaunilos argument is invalid, whereas anselms is valid. Over the centuries, many philosophers have presented criticisms against anselms ontological argument, from gaunilo to descartes and locke to lotze. The simple argument in proslogion 2 was reduced to absurdity by anselm s fellow benedictine, gaunilo, in a witty reposte entitled liber pro insipiente or on behalf of the fool. Anselms ontological argument as a means of seeking understaning in chapters 2 through 4 of the proslogion, anselm submits his ontological argument as a rational proof for the existence of god. Pdf an argument against descartes ontological argument. Matthews anselms ontological argument in proslogion 2 has been discussed and criticized so much that it is hard for us today to see its basic structure. The ontological argument for the existence of god is the only a priori argument for gods existence.
The validity of anselms ontological argument anselm expresses his ontological argument of proslogium, chapter ll as follows. Anselm was the archbishop of canterbury who lived from 10331109 a. Now we believe that you are are something than which nothing greater can be thought. Anselms text anselms ontological argument is presented in his proslogion, starting with chapter ii, though where the argument ends is more controversial. Other ontological arguments must be judged on their own merits. St anselms ontological argument is a deductive, priori, analytic argument which seeks to establish the existence of god by understanding the attributes of god in the sense of classic theism. Saint anselm 10331109 proslogion translated by sidney. Anselm wrote his proslogion as a prayer originally, but it later became an argument for god by establishing his attributes. More specifically, ontological arguments tend to start with a priori theory about the organization of the universe. The paper examines the way in which faith seeking understanding, the ontological argument, and the derivation of the divine.
Anselm, who claims that once we understand the nature of god as a being than which nothing greater can be. Professor malcolm on anselm s ontological arguments, analysis, 1961. In the present sense of this term, there are infinitely many ontologi cal arguments, all of them valid. Anselm means when he writes there is only one way god can be.
The form of the argument is that of a reductio ad absurdum argument. He argued that many theists would accept that god, by nature, cannot be fully comprehended. In the ontological argument, he constructs a reductio ad absurdum in effort to. The ontological argument from st anselm, proslogium, trans.
Anselm intended to prove the existence of god, there is disagreement about where the proof is. Many recent authors have interpreted this argument as a modal one. Thus, this argument should also be valid against anselm s ontological argument in some aspect. Anselms argument together with gaunilos, aquinas and kants objections are conveniently summarized by kenneth einar himma in the internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Anselms proof, known since the time of kant as the ontological argument for the existence of god, has played an important role in the history of philosophy and has been incorporated in various forms into the systems of descartes, leibniz, hegel, and others. The core of anselms ontological argument uses a reductio ad absurdum structure to attempt to prove the existence of god. He offered a further criticism of anselms ontological argument, suggesting that the notion of god cannot be conceived, as anselm had asserted. Anselm begins with a stipulative definition of god as a being than which no greater being can be conceived. This entry is a good place to start for clarification of the above notes to the argument. The ontological argument for the existence of god word. Speaks january 6, 2006 1 anselms presentation of the argument anselms argument begins with a statement of what god is. One might put the argument in other words, and argue that god.
One might argue that one of the premises of gaunilos argument is false, whereas the corresponding premise of anselms argument is true. Anselms actual argument, unlike most versions, is an exercise in intentional logic, a fact that. This is anselms somewhat unwieldy description of god, which i will abbreviate bngc. There is an enormous literature on the material in proslogion iiiii. Anselm s proof, known since the time of kant as the ontological argument for the existence of god, has played an important role in the history of philosophy and has been incorporated in various forms into the systems of descartes, leibniz, hegel, and others. Anselm starts with an idea that depends on experience for their justification and then proceeds by purely logical means to the conclusion that god exists. Therefore, if humans cannot fully conceive of god, the ontological argument cannot work. Ontological arguments about the existence of god, based in premises ostensibly derived. An ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of god that uses ontology. Ontological arguments stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Anselms second version of the ontological argument as it turns out, there are two different versions of the ontological argument in the prosologium. Anselm and of gaunilo, two eleventhcentury thinkers, are both ontological in character. The relevance of kants objection to anselms ontological. Anselm, who claims that once we understand the nature of god as a being than which nothing greater can be conceived, we realize that his essence implies his existence.
The premises of anselms ontological argument were demonstrated to be sound when examined in the context of anselms definition of the greatest conceivable being. Anselms ontological argument for the existence of god anselms argument is an a priori argument. The ontological argument baggaley 2 look at some of the major arguments for and against the ontological argument. He does this by showing that if the negation of the conclusion is followed then this leads to absurdity a false or nonsensical conclusion. Anselms a prioriargument for the existence of god today we will look at anselms ontological argument for the existence of god. The one fatal flaw in anselms argument 439 gods existence, and another under which it is validand indeed soundbut fails to prove the existence of god. Anselms conception of god is that than which nothing greater can be conceived. Anselms ontological argument is an a priori proof of gods existence. While there are different versions of the ontological argument, i will here focus on one of the earliest. Anselms original argument, in contrast, does link gods spiritual ultimacy his being greatest in terms of goodness with gods ontological ultimacy his be ing greatest in terms of being, and. A criticism of anselms ontological argument leaving. Actually anselms argument belittles the definition of god, since it cannot be derived from his proof whether god is allpowerful, all knowing, and omnipresent or not.
482 1474 904 740 1177 410 1340 366 818 412 930 187 1207 1555 32 221 1426 1230 1494 1213 1372 421 1455 140 455 986 1001 755 234 3 1405 819 926 335 8 1304 909 940 699 498 1069 1434